Jackson County Case Study

Messaging Architects E-mail Policy Workshop

Wright's Public Appearances

My Photo

Moderator

  • Attorney Benjamin Wright is an advisor to Messaging Architects, specialists in email compliance and risk management controls and services. He is the author of numerous books on technology law, including The Law of Electronic Commerce (Aspen Publishers) and Business Law and Computer Security (SANS). He often serves as featured speaker at industry conferences and professional meetings, and he teaches data security and e-discovery law at the SANS Institute. Mr. Wright recently delivered SANS Onsite to the e-discovery team of a major corporation. His telephone is 1.214.403.6642. His e-mail is ben_wright at compuserve dot com (put "BLOG" in subject line to distinguish yourself from spam). Mr. Wright graduated from Georgetown University Law Center 1984.

SANS Quote

  • "The best guy in the country on these issues is Ben Wright." --Stephen H. Chapman, Principal and CEO, Security Advisers, LLC, and student in Mr. Wright's SANS legal training

What Sets This Blog Apart?

  • Most law blogs simply describe the latest cases and laws. But Wright’s Legal Beagle tells the best stories in data records law, often pulling several cases or developments into a single story for public dialogue. Sometimes those stories are several years old. Mr. Wright explains how those stories teach practical, even timeless general lessons.

Important!

  • No public statement by Mr. Wright (blog, comment, book, article, video, speech) is legal advice for any particular situation. If you need legal advice, you should consult your lawyer.

    The purpose of this blog is public discussion, not the delivery of legal, technical or other professional advice. If you need advice or complete information, this blog is not the place to get it. The information here is offered as-is, with no warranty of accuracy or reliability. Mr. Wright from time to time revises the ideas published here. If you use the ideas, you do so at your own risk.

    This blog serves as the online update service for the book The Law of Electronic Commerce. Originally released 1991, and revised continually since then, the book is a major reference for lawyers, published by Aspen Publishers.

    Mr. Wright identifies his association with quality organizations like Messaging Architects and SANS Institute. However, the only person responsible for Mr. Wright's words is Mr. Wright.

    Mr. Wright’s policy is to comply with all applicable laws. If any person ever has any information or belief that Mr. Wright has done anything illegal or unethical, he asks that person promptly to notify him at 1.214.403.6642.

Search

Environmental Responsibility

  • Dallas, Texas. Mr. Wright is a green professional.

« Healthcare Internal Control: Retained E-mail & IM Records | Main | Local Government E-mail and the Freedom of Information Act »

August 14, 2008

Healthcare, Government e-Discovery and E-mail Destruction

Duty to Preserve Electronically Stored Information (ESI)
Standard for E-mail Litigation Hold

When a lawsuit is filed or reasonably anticipated, parties are expected to apply a litigation hold to ensure records are not destroyed.

In a class action case concerning rights to state-paid medical care (connected with Medicare), a federal trial court has criticized Tennessee state agencies (Defendants) for failing to preserve electronic records.  Said the court:

"Defendants left their employees to decide on their own what to retain without evidence of any written instruction or guidance from counsel on what is significant o[r] material information in this complex action.  Under the State's computer system, after six to seven months emails were destroyed.  Some key custodians did not have backup tapes for their work station computer.  Given the complexity of this action, isolated statements [from counsel to employees] about the litigation hold over a period of several years are equivalent to the lack of any meaningful litigation hold." John B. v. Goetz, 2007 WL 3012808 (M.D. Tennessee Oct. 10, 2007), Memorandum, page 126.

The court went on to criticize the inadequate litigation hold at Defendants' contractors.

The court’s statements open the possibility for e-discovery sanctions against Defendants.    

The case reminds how courts can scrutinize e-mail retention decisions years after the decisions are made.  It illuminates the danger when an enterprise leaves retention and destruction responsibility in the hands of individual employees (or contractors), who may not be fully aware of the legal implications of that responsibility.  Accordingly, I advocate generous, centralized retention of enterprise e-mail and text messages.  By "centralized," I mean the records are retained in an enterprise-controlled archive such that employees cannot destroy their individual records.

Here a federal court second-guessed Tennesee state agencies.  But in theory the state involved could just as easily have been Iowa, Oregon, Nevada, Texas, Idaho or any other.

–Benjamin Wright

Mr. Wright is an advisor to Messaging Architects, leading provider of e-mail archival solutions for healthcare.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e553eadb27883400e553e5b0cb8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Healthcare, Government e-Discovery and E-mail Destruction:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Categories

E-mail Mr. Wright

  • Contact Form